| 2.12 |
The historical tradition of category and rules of classification |
|
| |
Literally hundreds of classification
systems have been created since the emergence of organized human civilization
and knowledge. Essentially, all these rule and classification systems can be
categorized into one of two main types of rule systems- bivalent and
multivalent. |
|
| |
The word valent, is derived from
the Latin word valentia (power, competence) and valere (be
powerful). |
|
| 2.12.1
|
Bivalent systems |
|
| |
The word Bivalent means essentially
"two-power" or "two-choice". Bivalent systems are based on the prime idea that
every sentence/statement in a given class of sentences is either true, or false
with "truth" or "falsity" as the only possible alternatives. |
|
| |
The earliest bivalent systems were based on the laws
of the Gods being the "truth" and anything not conforming to these rules as
being the "false", or "bad." |
|
| |
Then around 300BC, the most successful and widely used
thinking system in human history was invented and systematized by Aristotle in
Ancient Greece into the science we now call logic. |
|
| 2.12.2 |
Bivalent system- Logic |
|
| |
Logic is derived from the practical problems of
classification - how to define things. Aristotle, it's inventor, was interested
in understanding of how everything fitted. Thus logic firstly is a method of
classification. |
|
| |
The second need was the ability to justify how and why
something is classified the way it has been. At the time of Aristotle, without
certain rules, arguments would rage for months between some minds- without
coming to agreement on common terms, classifications. |
|
| |
The early part of Greece philosophy was entirely
engrossed on this point- the debate of different absolute systems for
classification. Sometimes philosophy schools would take opposing sides, because
they could. |
|
| |
Using Aristotle's method of argument, something either
is, or is not. Therefore, according to logic, something cannot be and not-be at
the same time. Such arguments are considered illogical. |
|
| |
Further, Aristotle saw as an immediate byproduct of
the argument of logic was that by knowing the relationships of some knowledge,
other knowledge (pattern) might be deduced. The more that is classified, the
more knowledge can be derived from pattern. Thus logic has been a very
important and powerful tool over the past two and a half thousand years. |
|
| |
By combining a method of classification on a or b
and applying a "law of excluded middle", arguments could be strongly applied. |
|
| |
Thus logic provides a powerful method of judgment and
securing success between the argument of ideas. |
|
| |
Because of logic's ability to (1) enable clear
classification and (2) judgment and justification of classification (often self
referenced), arguments that are framed in a strong "logical" structure are
considered superior to those that are not. |
|
| |
To individuals and organizations desiring their
arguments to be successful, the system of logic did and still does present an
irresistible vehicle for structuring their view of the world. |
|
| |
The formal system was (and still is) extremely popular
with organized religions as a method of arguing points of belief (theology),
considering the close parallel between the bivalent system of the "law of
god(s)" and logic. |
|
| |
Today, an area of human research and endeavor is not
considered a science, or scientific unless it adheres rigorously to logic.
Logic is the backbone, the fundamental premise upon which every science and
social science - the entire knowledge based of humanity is largely based. In a
bizarre twist, most views of the modern world of human philosophy place
religion at one end of the spectrum with science at the other. |
|
| |
Yet to religions such as Christianity,
logic is just as important tool and Aristotle just as important figure as the
articles of faith that are proclaimed. |
|
| |
Aristotle created a box, then rules for the box,
justifying the box. A or B- everything either fits or doesn't fit. Everything
fits something best once. Thus bivalent logic was created and remains
intertwined with almost every part of our lives every day, whether we know it
or not. |
|
| 2.12.3 |
Multivalent systems |
|
| |
Multivalent systems as the name implies are
those that offer more than two choices. Unlike bivalent systems, no serious
formal development of a multivalent system emerged until the 20th century with
the development of "fuzzy" logic. |
|
| |
As opposed to logic, fuzzy logic refutes the notion
that statements must conform to the notion "a or not-a." Instead, fuzzy logic
states 100% a and 100% not-a as the boundaries, with most statements falling
somewhere in the middle. As this is the "grey" area between black and white
logic, the term fuzzy was coined in the 1960's to denote the difference between
this system. |
|
| |
Fuzzy logic has enjoyed a strong popularity in
technical application in Eastern countries in the past few years, with this
system of rules classification being used to create "intelligent" machines such
as dishwashers that can detect the level of grime and modify the cleaning
cycle, as well as air-conditioning units that can detect the internal air
temperature of the room and maintain optimum temperature. |
|
| |
More recently, fuzzy logic or "multivalent" logic has
been adopted as a method by which natural rules may be applied to increase
intelligence in robotics and the pursuit of AI- artificial intelligence in
machines. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |