| 2.14 |
The inescapable web of logic |
|
| |
At the beginning of this
chapter we outlined the common sense understanding that we are profoundly
influenced by the systems of classification around us. Yet how often are we
aware of the true meaning of the words we use on a daily basis (such as truth
for instance)? Are we fully conscious of the sticky an virtually inescapable
web of logic? |
|
| 2.14.1
|
The mastery of hidden self reference
|
|
| |
Earlier, we introduced a range of
concepts called Prime Universal Constants that underpin almost all of the major
rule systems of every society and system of humanity. While we did not outline
every prime universal constant, we considered the original definitions of: |
|
| |
| (religion) |
(science) |
| God or Gods |
Universal laws (science) |
| Laws from Gods
|
|
|
Truth |
| faith |
reality |
| loyalty, honesty |
fact |
|
Validity |
|
Reason |
|
Rationality |
|
|
| |
Upon closer inspection of
these words we use daily, whether we believe in God or not, is that they are
built upon multiple meanings that then link each word in a sticky web of
circular self-reference back to the concept of Logic- a or b, black or white,
right or wrong. |
|
| |
If you choose to speak English and if you
choose to use these words in any way (as even the author is forced to do at
this point) then you (a) cannot escape the multiple meanings attached to these
words and (b) their link back to logic. |
|
| 2.14.2
|
These prime universal constants represent
the pillars of our society |
|
| |
The importance of dwelling for a moment
on these prime universal constants is that they represent the fundamental
pillars of our society. They are intertwined with our concepts of law, of
government, of justice, of religion and even of basic human behaviour. |
|
| |
None of this itself is
necessarily negative, except for the "fact" that these concepts in
themselves all represent words with multiple, sometimes opposing meanings. For
example, a contemporary understanding of validity might be "correct,
true", yet the hidden meaning of validity is more aligned to
"whatever the leaders say is true is true." |
|
| |
If you choose to design an argument that
differs in anyway to logic, you cannot by definition consider using any of the prime
universal constants listed above:- for they have been carefully
repositioned to reinforce the web of logic. |
|
| |
So strong has this sticky web of logic
been that bivalent classification remains virtually unchallenged even after
2,300 years. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |